TUDM SU-30 ETA?
#23
Posted 26 May 2007 - 02:38 AM
yeap...the su30mkm does include the front canards with thrust vectoring as well...im alredi drooling by the fact that we got this plane with specs almost identical to the indian su30 MKI..my god..people have been saying that the MKI is better then the su37 terminator and we are ownig 18 of it!LIMA 07 will be a must for me!!
#24
Posted 27 May 2007 - 04:16 AM
http://pilot.strizhi...2007/05/26/3705
Shows aircraft M52-02 in several photos.
Geoff

#25
Posted 27 May 2007 - 12:00 PM
1) Ahead of the canopy, on the nose, off-set to the left, it appears to be a set of four blades that looks similar to the 'Bird-Slicer' IFF fitted on the F-16ADF.
2) Small blister, right below the tip of the root extension (LERX). Warning receiver?
3) Blister under nose, just ahead of the nose gear door cover.
4) Enlarged rudder. Compare it to other Su-30s.
#26
Posted 27 May 2007 - 12:28 PM
does the enlarged rudder means extra maneuverability?the irkutsk company will be setting up a mantainence center here right?i dun want to see untrained hands anywhere near the plane...
btw..did we purchase this plane with the r73s,r77 etc.?the missiles came together with the deal or we didnt buy any?
#28
Posted 27 May 2007 - 12:40 PM
an interesting article..
January 17, 2004
On 16th December, the Thales Group, a large European defense electronics manufacturer, signed a 150 million Euro (approximately $193 million) deal to provide avionics for the 18 Su-30MKM that Malaysia recently ordered.
The deal involves the installation of avionics, navigation, identification and optronics systems on the aircraft in Russia, and which will be carried out in partnership with Sukhoi, with integration under the oversight of the Royal Malaysian Air Force (RMAF).
Malaysia's Su-30MKM are based on the Indian Su-30MKI variants, except that Malaysia has refused, for political reasons, to use the same Israeli developed avionics and electronics systems that the Indians use. Choosing Thales to provide these systems is interesting, because depending on what Thales products the RMAF actually purchased, the Su-30MKM could very well have an avionics system comparable to the most advanced French warplane, the Rafael. For example, Thales manufactures two air-to-air IRST sensors, one of which is used on the Rafael, and the other the Eurofighter. The Su-30MKM thus has the potential to be the most advanced and potent Su-30 variant ever, eclipsing the Su-30MKI.
On the down-side, the integration of these systems with Russian avionics and weapon systems may take some time. India, for example, spent six years integrating Indian and Israeli systems into the Su-30MKI.
btw..why are they shipping the sukhois by plane rather then flying them here??
This post has been edited by iwan: 27 May 2007 - 12:41 PM
#30
Posted 27 May 2007 - 09:43 PM
does the enlarged rudder means extra maneuverability?the irkutsk company will be setting up a mantainence center here right?i dun want to see untrained hands anywhere near the plane...
btw..did we purchase this plane with the r73s,r77 etc.?the missiles came together with the deal or we didnt buy any?
I don't know how significant the enlarged rudder will be. Yes, the Irkutsk company is setting up a center here similar to the ones for the MiGs.
It is also interesting that the MKM was displayed with just the R73s and R27s. Probably due to political sensitivity. It is extremley wasteful if the government have no intention of arming the MKMs with the R77s, the N011 BARS will need the R77s to go hand in hand in order to be effective. The RSiAF are openly flashing their AAMRAMS so why all the sensitivity?
#31
Posted 28 May 2007 - 02:12 AM
btw..i just noticed in the pic..the airbrake at the tip of he wing..i thot su30s dun actually have those unlike the su25s??or is that a loose sticker peeling off?
ow yea...it took me until now to introduce myself..was just too excited to finally find this forum..im just a student very much interested in fighter jets..hope to learn a lot more from this forum...
#32
Posted 28 May 2007 - 02:21 AM
This post has been edited by Edwin Yii: 28 May 2007 - 02:22 AM
#33
Posted 28 May 2007 - 03:49 AM
http://www.youtube.c...h?v=XIxr4PDT544
enjoy!
#34
Posted 28 May 2007 - 05:35 AM
btw..i just noticed in the pic..the airbrake at the tip of he wing..i thot su30s dun actually have those unlike the su25s??or is that a loose sticker peeling off?
ow yea...it took me until now to introduce myself..was just too excited to finally find this forum..im just a student very much interested in fighter jets..hope to learn a lot more from this forum...
The MKMs will probably get the usual R73/74, R27 and R77 BVRs. As for air-to-ground munitions I suspect it will carry some western/NATO munitions. Thales has integrated the Damocles multi-mission and targetting system to the MKMs (same as the Rafales) thus the chances of the MKMs wired to fire western air-to-surface munitions is high.
On the air brake thingy, it is just the angle of the shot...you are looking at the dorsal brake (F-15 style).
Thanks for introducing yourself, I'm new here too - Hi everyone!!!
#35
Posted 28 May 2007 - 09:36 AM
Those missiles could be in the package?? or were they arent just to protect themselves during ferry flight kekekee... who knows
Iggy, that the dummy one....notice there is no "engine nozzle" on that missile...
#36
Posted 28 May 2007 - 10:03 AM
Malaysia needs these aircraft about as much as a taxi company needs Ferraris. Nice to have, but way, way more than could ever possibly be needed and it’s just going to result in the “competition” buying more than they need in order to keep up appearances. It would be cheaper for your taxpayers if your political and military leaders didn’t worry about the size of their penises and try to compensate this way.
Comment by Phil Aysho — May 27, 2007 @ 2:36 am
what's you guys think about it...I wonder this guy is our neighbor
This post has been edited by Saiful Bahari: 28 May 2007 - 10:08 AM
#37
Posted 28 May 2007 - 01:48 PM
about the dorsal brakes thingy...was it on the previous versions of sukhois?and why are they bringing the sukhois by plane instead of flying those birds here?did we request for a 'brand new' untouched plane?
#39
Posted 28 May 2007 - 09:07 PM
As for that fella Phil Aysho he is probably harboring secret desire of seeing a fleet of MKMs in his country as well.
#40
Posted 29 May 2007 - 01:03 AM
I surely did, Edwin, thanks for sharing the link: great to see this fighter being 'born'

Sign In
Register
Help
MultiQuote